March 2023 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Exam Dumps

Killexams 050-SEPROSIEM-01 actual exam dumps includes latest syllabus of RSA Certified SE Professional in Security Information and Event Management exam with up-to-date exam contents | complete pool of questions

050-SEPROSIEM-01 Detail

050-SEPROSIEM-01 PDF Exam Dumps and VCE

050-SEPROSIEM-01 Exam Included 3 Products;

  • 050-SEPROSIEM-01 PDF Exam Questions and Answers : 050-SEPROSIEM-01 PDF Questions and answers are complete pool of questions in PDF format that you can use on any operating system like Windows, MacOS, Linux etc or any device like computer, android phone, ipad, iphone or any other hand held device etc. You can print and make your own book to read anywhere you travel or stay. PDF is suitable for high quality printing and reading offline.
  • 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Online Test Engine (OTE) : Our 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Online Test Engine is updated at real time. Each and every question in the RSA exam pool is added or removed in such a way that you do not need to download or update anything. It is just logging into your myAccount section and click on OTE icon and you will be able to take test using actual 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam questions and answers. It provides facility to maintain your test performance, history and graphs. You can see each of your mistake in the exam. You can learn the questions and answers like you do in the book. It supports all browsers, operation systems and devices like iOS iphone/ipad, android, Linux, Windows etc.
  • VCE Exam Simulator 3.0.9 : Killexams 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Exam Simulator is full screen windows app that is like the 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam screen you experience in actual test center. This software provide you test environment where you can answer the 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam questions, take test, review your false answers, monitor your performance in the test.

050-SEPROSIEM-01 Exam Braindumps

We offer 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Braindumps containing actual 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam questions and answers. These PDF Exam Dumps are very useful in passing the 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exams at first attempt.

Real 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Exam Questions and Answers

These 050-SEPROSIEM-01 questions and answers are taken from the actual 050-SEPROSIEM-01 question pool that candidate face in actual test. These real 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam QAs are exact copy of the 050-SEPROSIEM-01 questions and answers you face in the exam.

050-SEPROSIEM-01 Practice Tests

050-SEPROSIEM-01 Practice Test uses the same questions and answers that are provided in the actual 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam pool so that candidate can be prepared for real test environment. These 050-SEPROSIEM-01 practice tests are very helpful in practicing the 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam.

050-SEPROSIEM-01 Question pool update

050-SEPROSIEM-01 Questions and answers are updated on regular basis to reflect the latest changes in the 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam. Whenever any change is made in actual 050-SEPROSIEM-01 test, we provide the changes in our 050-SEPROSIEM-01 question bank.

Complete 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Exam Collection

Here you can find complete RSA exam collection where Questions and answers are updated on regular basis to reflect the latest changes in the 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam. Whenever any change is made in actual 050-SEPROSIEM-01 test, we provide the changes in our 050-SEPROSIEM-01 question bank.

RSA Certified SE Professional in Security Information and Event Management Exam dumps 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam dumps contain complete question pool, updated in March 2023 including VCE exam simulator that will help you get high marks in the exam. All these 050-SEPROSIEM-01 exam questions are verified by killexams certified professionals and backed by 100% money back guarantee.

Exam Code: 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Practice exam 2023 by team
RSA Certified SE Professional in Security Information and Event Management
RSA Professional testing
Killexams : RSA Professional testing - 100% Guaranteed Search results Killexams : RSA Professional testing - 100% Guaranteed Killexams : RSA top Test rankings; India stay in fifth

South Africa consolidated their lead in the latest ICC Test Championship rankings issued on Tuesday while India retained the number five position. India last played a three-Test series in December against England which they lost 1-2 but they remained on 105 points. They are four points behind arch-rivals Pakistan, who have 109 points and are placed in the fourth spot. A 2-0 series win over New Zealand has earned South Africa one rating point and has lifted them to 124 points. This has opened up a six-point lead over second-ranked England. Meanwhile, Sachin Tendulkar is the lone Indian batsman in the top 20 list of ICC rankings for Test batsmen. With 653 points to his credit, Tendulkar has gained a spot and he is in the 19th position. Michael Clarke of Australia is currently the No.1 Test batsman thanks to his wonderful run in 2012. However, South Africa's Hashim Amla has moved within a striking distance of claiming the number one position for the first time in his career after he moved up a place to second. Amla is just one rating point behind Clarke and will have a shot at the coveted position when South Africa take on Pakistan in the first Test in Johannesburg starting on February 1. In contrast, Clarke will return to the Test arena only on February 22 when Australia face India in the first Test of the four-match series in Chennai. Pragyan Ojha (9th spot), Zaheer Khan (15th spot) and Ravichandran Ashwin (20th spot) are the three Indian bowlers in the top 20 and all have managed to maintain their respective places in the list. South African pacer Dale Steyn still tops the list. He has further consolidated his lead thanks to spells of 5/17 and 3/48 against New Zealand in the final Test at Port Elizabeth. Steyn has opened up a 45 point gap with team-mate Vernon Philander, who is currently placed second. Philander lost one rating point for missing the second Test due to injury.

Sun, 02 Aug 2020 05:20:00 -0500 en text/html
Killexams : RSA: NSA Testing Motorola Android Smartphones for Top-Secret Calls

Who says Android is the most insecure mobile OS around? Not the National Security Agency, which is conducting a pilot of 100 Motorola smartphones running the Android OS that it says are already good enough for its employees to make top-secret and classified phone calls from the field.

"There are vulnerabilities in every OS," said Margaret Salter, a technical director in the NSA's Information Assurance Directorate (IAD), during a talk Wednesday morning at the RSA Conference in San Francisco. "The beauty of our strategy is that we looked at all of the components, and then took stuff out of the (Android) OS we didn't need. This makes the attack surface very small."

Other U.S. government agencies such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are dumping Blackberries for iPhones.

For the NSA, the open-source nature of Android tipped the balance in its favor. "It's not because iOS was lousy, no. It's because of certain controls we needed. We were able to make some modifications to Android. Android had that freedom," she said. Does that mean the NSA is wedded to the Google OS? "It's not our intention to use only Android."

Since the NSA's founding in 1952, the IDA had been the sole creator of proprietary equipment used by U.S. Government agents for secure communications. The disadvantage of this approach was that it was more expensive, "took us years to approve a device," said Salter, and also resulted in gear that "though incredibly secure, was not incredibly easy to use."

The Android smartphone pilot, nicknamed Project Fishbowl, is part of the IAD's move away from GOTS (Government-Off-The-Shelf) technology towards best-of-breed COTS (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf) gear that the IAD will customize and integrate.

Salter didn't disclose which Motorola model the NSA is testing. But it is likely to be one of Motorola's Business Ready Smartphones, most of which come securable with Sybase's Afaria.

The NSA's aim is to make its secure mobile phones as easy to use as regular consumer smartphones, and the overall architecture easy to upgrade.

"If some part of the architecture is not working the way we want, we have to be able to switch it out and plop a new box," she said.

(The slide above is from Salter's presentation. You can download the entire deck here.)

But the IAD's attempts "to go shopping" for such technology were severely hampered by a lack of interoperability with encryption and other security technologies.

"We wanted everything to be plug and play. And. That. Was. Hard," Salter said. That forced the NSA in some instances, when choosing software, to sacrifice performance in favor of broader support.

She urged vendors interested in supplying the NSA to visit, where they can view the NSA's requirements. "We need a partnership with industry," she said.

To cloak the voice calls, the NSA uses two independent layers of encryption, one at the VoIP layer, and the other at the VPN layer. The NSA "put a big X through an SSL VPN client" because, according to Salter, "there is no such thing as an SSL interoperable VPN standard."

Moreover, all voice calls using the Android phones are routed through the NSA's servers. That helps secure the calls so that the phones can be used with any carrier.

The final layers of security include a pair of authentication certificates residing on the handsets, as well as requiring users to log-in with a password before they can use the SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) server. This gives the NSA "good assurance to know who are the users," she said.

Doubly encrypting the calls plus the extra routing did make it initially hard to maintain good voice quality, said Salter. But as of today, there "is only a little bit of delay" in the calls. "You'd only notice it if you were in the same room as the caller and could see his lips moving. But I hope you're not using our phone in that context."

Using the phones overseas does add "some risk, but we also believe that we've spent a lot of effort to completely minimize this risk," Salter said, without going into details. "We actually have more trouble getting the phones to run in certain countries."

With the NSA satisfied with Fishbowl's handling of voice calls, Salter is already looking forward to testing the use of the phones to send and receive data and also do other forms of Unified Communications. Plans are to keep most data on the server.

To harden the handsets, the NSA had "to make changes to the key store" as well as "make a police app that keeps an eye on everything," Salter said.

Other than that, the NSA hasn't built any apps yet, said Salter. The Department of Defense's IT branch, the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), may both emulate the NSA pilot and build apps that the NSA could leverage, she said. If so, those apps would be deployed through an internal Enterprise App Store.

Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:28:00 -0600 en text/html
Killexams : RSA’s demise from quantum attacks is very much exaggerated, expert says
Abstract futuristic electronic circuit board high-tech background

Three weeks ago, panic swept across some corners of the security world after researchers discovered a breakthrough that, at long last, put the cracking of the widely used RSA encryption scheme within reach by using quantum computing.

Scientists and cryptographers have known for two decades that a factorization method known as Shor’s algorithm makes it theoretically possible for a quantum computer with sufficient resources to break RSA. That’s because the secret prime numbers that underpin the security of an RSA key are easy to calculate using Shor’s algorithm. Computing the same primes using classical computing takes billions of years.

The only thing holding back this doomsday scenario is the massive amount of computing resources required for Shor’s algorithm to break RSA keys of sufficient size. The current estimate is that breaking a 1,024-bit or 2,048-bit RSA key requires a quantum computer with vast resources. Specifically, those resources are about 20 million qubits and about eight hours of them running in superposition. (A qubit is a basic unit of quantum computing, analogous to the binary bit in classical computing. But whereas a classic binary bit can represent only a single binary value such as a 0 or 1, a qubit is represented by a superposition of multiple possible states.)

The paper, published three weeks ago by a team of researchers in China, reported finding a factorization method that could break a 2,048-bit RSA key using a quantum system with just 372 qubits when it operated using thousands of operation steps. The finding, if true, would have meant that the fall of RSA encryption to quantum computing could come much sooner than most people believed.

RSA’s demise is greatly exaggerated

At the Enigma 2023 Conference in Santa Clara, California, on Tuesday, computer scientist and security and privacy expert Simson Garfinkel assured researchers that the demise of RSA was greatly exaggerated. For the time being, he said, quantum computing has few, if any, practical applications.

“In the near term, quantum computers are good for one thing, and that is getting papers published in prestigious journals,” Garfinkel, co-author with Chris Hoofnagle of the 2021 book Law and Policy for the Quantum Age, told the audience. “The second thing they are reasonably good at, but we don’t know for how much longer, is they’re reasonably good at getting funding.”

Even when quantum computing becomes advanced enough to provide useful applications, the applications are likely for simulating physics and chemistry, and performing computer optimizations that don’t work well with classical computing. Garfinkel said that the dearth of useful applications in the foreseeable future might bring on a “quantum winter,” similar to the multiple rounds of artificial intelligence winters before AI finally took off.

The problem with the paper published earlier this month was its reliance on Schnorr's algorithm (not to be confused with Shor’s algorithm), which was developed in 1994. Schnorr’s algorithm is a classical computation based on lattices, which are mathematical structures that have many applications in constructive cryptography and cryptanalysis. The authors who devised Schnorr’s algorithm said it could enhance the use of the heuristic quantum optimization method called QAOA.

Within short order, a host of researchers pointed out fatal flaws in Schnorr’s algorithm that have all but debunked it. Specifically, critics said there was no evidence supporting the authors’ claims of Schnorr’s algorithm achieving polynomial time, as opposed to the exponential time achieved with classical algorithms.

The research paper from three weeks ago seemed to take Schnorr's algorithm at face value. Even when it’s supposedly enhanced using QAOA—something there’s currently no support for—it’s questionable whether it provides any performance boost.

“All told, this is one of the most actively misleading quantum computing papers I’ve seen in 25 years, and I’ve seen … many,” Scott Aaronson, a computer scientist at the University of Texas at Austin and director of its Quantum Information Center, wrote. “Having said that, this actually isn’t the first time I’ve encountered the strange idea that the exponential quantum speedup for factoring integers, which we know about from Shor’s algorithm, should somehow ‘rub off’ onto quantum optimization heuristics that embody none of the real insights of Shor’s algorithm, as if by sympathetic magic.”

In geological time, yes; in our lifetime, no

On Tuesday, Japanese technology company Fujitsu published a press release that provided further reassurance that the cryptocalypse isn't nigh. Fujitsu researchers, the press release claimed, found that cracking an RSA key would require a fault-tolerant quantum computer with a scale of roughly 10,000 qubits and 2.23 trillion quantum gates, and even then, the computation would require about 104 days.

Attempts to obtain the research weren’t immediately successful, and Fujitsu researchers weren’t available by this story's publication. That makes it impossible for fellow researchers to know precisely what the findings are or how significant they are.

“For example, when [the Fujitsu researchers] say 10,000 qubits in the press release, do they mean logical or physical qubits?” Samuel Jaques, a doctoral student at the University of Cambridge, wrote in an email. “In my view, the best estimate for quantum factoring is still [Craig] Gidney and [Martin] Ekerå from 2020, who estimate that factoring RSA-2048 would need 20 million physical qubits and 8 hours. If Fujitsu's result drops the physical qubit count from 20 million to 10,000, that's a huge breakthrough; if instead they need 10,000 logical qubits, then that's much more than Gidney and Ekerå so I would need to check carefully to see why.”

Update: In an email sent after this post went live, one of the Fujitsu researchers, Tetsuya Izu, senior director of data & security research, wrote:

During the trials, we used a Shor’s algorithm and created a program to generate quantum circuits. As a next step, we used this program to generate quantum circuits for composite numbers of 9 bits and smaller, and checked real operations (integer factorization). We then evaluated the necessary computational resources of the above mentioned quantum circuits and made estimations for the case of integer factorization of 2,048 bits composite numbers. For this reason, our estimation also uses logical qubits. We are still finalizing the research paper and unfortunately cannot provide it today. We will share the paper with you as soon as it is available.

That leads us back to the Enigma Conference and Garfinkel, who, like Jaques, said the Gidney and Ekerå findings are the best-known estimate for the breaking of RSA. Asked to respond to the oft-repeated statement that humanity is at the precipice of a large quantum computer, Garfinkel responded:

“If by large-scale you mean something that’s big enough to crack an RSA key, what do you mean humanity is on the precipice? In geological time we certainly are. In terms of the duration of the republic, sure. But in our lifetimes?”

Even when the day comes that there’s a quantum computer with the power envisioned by Gidney and Ekerå, the notion that RSA will fall in one stroke is misleading. That’s because it would take this 20 million-qubit quantum system eight hours in constant superposition to crack a single encryption key. That would certainly be catastrophic since someone might be able to use the capability to cryptographically sign malicious updates with a Microsoft or Apple key and distribute them to millions of people.

But even then, the scenario that nation-states are storing all encrypted communications in a database and will decrypt them all in bulk once a quantum computer becomes available is unrealistic, given the number of keys and the resources required to crack them all.

Over the past five years, the National Institute of Standards and Technology has run a search for new cryptographic algorithms that aren’t vulnerable to Shor’s algorithm. The process is far from finished. Last year, a candidate that had made it to the fourth round was taken out of the running after it fell to an attack that used only classical computing.

Once a post-quantum replacement is named, Garfinkel warned, “There’s going to be this mad rush to sell new things to the government so the government can immediately adopt these new algorithms. There’s just so much money to be made selling things to the government.”

Despite his insistence that the world is still decades away from being able to crack an RSA key, Garfinkel left himself wiggle room. At the same time, he said too many people focus on the risk posed by Shor’s algorithm without considering the possibility that RSA could just as easily fall from other factorization attacks posed by classical computers.

“If I was at CISA [Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency], I wouldn’t feel the need to say, ‘Don’t worry, it’s decades away’ only to risk the entire security of the United States,” he said. “But maybe we shouldn’t be moving to just post-quantum algorithms. Maybe we should be using the post-quantum algorithms and RSA in parallel because there might be a problem with the post-quantum algorithms.”

Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:21:00 -0600 Dan Goodin en-us text/html
Killexams : Driving testers raised concerns after RSA allowed cars without valid NCT to be used for test Photo from the RSA website. Photo from the RSA website.

DRIVING TESTERS RAISED concerns they were being put at risk after the Road Safety Authority (RSA) changed rules to allow cars without a valid NCT to be used during a driving test.

The RSA temporarily relaxed rules around the obligation to have an up-to-date NCT because of long delays for motorists in getting an appointment to have their cars checked.

However, a union representing driver testers said the proposed changes presented a “serious health and safety concern” for their members.

In one email last October, they said they needed much more detail on what was being planned saying “the priority must be the health and safety of testers”.

In later correspondence with the RSA in November, a Fórsa representative said they continued to be worried about the “potential risk” to driver testers from non-NCT’d cars.

A letter said: “Fórsa are advising our driver tester members to adhere to the RSA protocol that all vehicles presented for a driving test must display a valid NCT disk.

“RSA circulars set out the position on the necessity to have a valid NCT disk. This is a serious health and safety concern for Fórsa and our Fórsa driver tester members.”

In response, the RSA said the union could rest assured that the “health and safety” of staff members was a “key factor” in any decision-making process.

An updated internal risk register said the changes were being made because of significant delays for motorists in getting an NCT test.

It said they had been told by Gardaí that they would not be penalising drivers who did not have a current valid NCT disc while Insurance Ireland were also taking this “pragmatic and understanding approach”.

The RSA said they would adapt the same position but that it would only cover cars where the NCT was less than three months out of date.

The risk register said the chances of a car not being roadworthy at the time of a test was an “unknown” anyway depending on when the NCT had taken place.

The risk register said: “In the case of a vehicle with a valid NCT disc which may be reaching the expiry date, this means that the roadworthiness test was conducted almost one or two years ago, so an element of risk of vehicle roadworthiness still prevails and is unknown at the time of test.”

It said staff could continue to rely on visual inspections of the vehicle prior to testing to assess any sign of malfunction including suspension failure, fumes in the cabin, loss of power, or other obvious issues.

“If a defect is identified, the test will not proceed,” said the risk register. It said testers could also check the NCT app to be sure the three-month window had not passed.

However, the risk register concluded that there remained a “medium” risk from the proposed changes in the event of injury during a road traffic accident.

In correspondence with Fórsa, the RSA also made assurances they were doing everything they could to cut NCT waiting times.

They said: “[We] continue on a weekly basis to have calls with [the NCT provider] to ensure there is no loss of momentum in getting our services back to the service levels agreed.”

A spokesman for the Road Safety Authority said there was a responsibility on motorists to ensure their car was always in roadworthy condition when driving.

He said: “At the start of a driving test, as part of the insurance declaration, all candidates are required to formally to confirm that their vehicle is in a roadworthy condition before the driving test can commence.

“Driver testers also conduct visual inspections before the driving test to check lights, indicators, brake lights etc. The policy only allows for an NCT certificate that has expired within three months of the driving test date and the candidate must show evidence of an imminent NCT test appointment.”

Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:55:00 -0600 en-IE text/html
Killexams : AUS v RSA: First Test, Day 1 Highlights No result found, try new keyword!A NOTE ABOUT RELEVANT ADVERTISING: We collect information about the content (including ads) you use across this site and use it to make both advertising and content more relevant to you on our ... Fri, 16 Dec 2023 18:36:00 -0600 en-AU text/html!839452?nk=d2fa400a32c6bab4343e224726499e7b-1676857786 Killexams : RSA Security explores $2 bln-plus sale of Archer -sources

Jan 18 (Reuters) - RSA Security LLC, the former cyber security division of Dell Technologies Inc (DELL.N), is exploring a sale of its risk and compliance software unit Archer for more than $2 billion, according to people familiar with the matter.

RSA is working with investment banks Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) on an auction for Archer, which has attracted interest from other companies and buyout firms, the sources said.

Archer generated $220 million in revenue last year and is growing profitably, added the sources, who requested anonymity because the matter is confidential.

Spokespeople for Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs declined to comment, while RSA did not respond to a request for comment.

The potential sale represents the latest in a string of deals involving RSA. Private equity firm Symphony Technology Group (STG), Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, and Carlyle Group Inc's (CG.O) investment arm AlpInvest Partners acquired the company from Dell for $2.075 billion in 2020.

Latest Updates

View 2 more stories

Clearlake Capital, another private equity firm, invested in RSA the following year.

In 2021, RSA cut a deal with Reed Taussig, the head of its fraud prevention software business Outseer, to spin it off as an independent company. Last year, RSA sold a majority stake in its events business, RSA Conference, to private equity firm Crosspoint Capital Partners for an undisclosed amount.

Archer, headquartered in Bedford, Massachusetts, is a governance, risk and compliance software platform with over 15,000 users globally. RSA's other business divisions include identity and access management platform SecureID and threat detection and response software platform NetWitness.

Archer is not the only risk management software vendor up for sale in the United States. Reuters reported last month that private equity firm BC Partners is exploring the sale of a stake in Navex Global Inc that could value the company at more than $3 billion.

Reporting by Milana Vinn in New York Editing by Matthew Lewis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:08:00 -0600 Milana Vinn en text/html
Killexams : Almost 50k Learner drivers to wait 19 weeks for a test, says RSA


Almost 50k Learner drivers to wait 19 weeks for a test, says RSA

The national average waiting time for a driving test is currently 19 weeks, almost double the RSA’s target.

LAST UPDATE | Feb 1st 2023, 5:30 PM

THE CEO OF the Road Safety Authority told the Oireachtas Transport committee that there are currently 47,364 learners waiting to sit a driving test and a 19-week national average waiting time for an appointment.

Sam Waide said this morning that the RSA’s target waiting time is 10 weeks and that the group is currently providing an average of 4,000 tests per week, up from 3,000 in October 2023.

“However the resource level is not enough, the current staffing level will neither reduce the backlog of driving tests nor will it meet the projected future demands for the service based on the learner permit demand,” he said.

Waide said beyond 2023/24 the RSA projects that a permanent pool of 170 testers will be required to meet estimated future demand.

“The message I wish to tell our customers is we are doing everything we can to return the services to normal,” he said.

NCT delay

Waide and a representative from an NCT services contractor also addressed the lengthy waiting times facing drivers getting their NCT.

The average wait between booking an appointment and the next available appointment date is currently 27 days, compared to a pre-pandemic average of 12 days, the RSA has confirmed.

Data from December 2023 compiled by the National Car Testing Service showed that Kells in County Meath had the longest wait time of any NCT centre, at 42 days.

Waide apologised for the inconvenience these protracted wait times have caused drivers.

The service is currently provided at 49 test centres nationwide under a contract awarded to Applus Inspection Services Ireland Ltd. The deal is set to run until June 2030.

Applus’s country representative for Ireland, Mark Synnott, also spoke to the committee.

Over 35,000 tests per week are currently being carried out according to the latest data on NCTs – that is up from 28,000 average in the last three months of 2023. However, there are approximately 375,000 vehicles overdue with their NCT.

This is 170,000 above the norm for this time of year, Waide said.

“Covid caused significant staff absenteeism levels at test centres and in the call centre,” he said.

“There were also very high levels of customer no-shows and late cancellations, reduced availability of new cars has meant there are more older cars in the Irish fleet. 

Synnott addressed the pandemic’s impact on staffing within the industry, as well as the actions taken by Applus to rectify the current NCT delays.

In his opening statement, Synnott said that 2,500 vehicles do not show up for their appointment each week and a further 1,000 cancel just before the test.

That’s a combined 3,500 vehicles each and every week foregoing their appointment and looking for a new one.”

He also explained how vehicles tend to be registered in the first few months of each year, meaning that quarter one of any year will have the largest demand for testing.

Synnott added that the NCTS managed this demand surge from 2016 to 2020 by proactively getting ahead of the demand curve but have been behind that curve and struggling to catch-up since the pandemic.

The beginning of 2023 saw a significant amount of Covid-19 transmission, which led to disruption in testing and caused a significant knock-on effect, increasing wait times, he told the committee.

According to Applus, 113 inspectors left the company during or after the pandemic, while the number of vehicles that required testing increased significantly.

However the company has since hired 124 new inspectors, including 44 recruited from the Philippines, the Applus representative explained. The company says it now employs the highest volumes of vehicle inspectors in the history of the NCTS.

Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:32:00 -0600 View all articles en text/html
Killexams : How we test, review and rate on TechRadar Pro: professional and business monitors null © Unsplash: Niclas Illg null

Our mission is simple: to be the source of professional-grade tech buying advice, offering everything you need to buy and maximize the tech you and your business rely on.

We take great satisfaction in our impartiality and meticulous review-testing procedure, examining the products we choose in great depth. We keep our reviews current and well maintained if the product in question is still available.

We have assembled an international team comprised of the best technology journalists on the planet, who approach their work not merely as industry experts, but also as individuals who use these technologies in their professional lives as gig operators, freelancers, side hustlers, and leaders in both large and small businesses. The professional is always kept in mind during our testing process.

Our editorial independence is backed by the weight of the world's largest technology publisher, Future Publishing, which means we can tell you what we think of a product without fear or favor.

Visit our About Us page to learn more about TechRadar Pro.

Our reviews guarantee

This is our promise to you:

  • We do not take payment for product reviews. Ever.
  • We select products for review based on what we believe our readers would want to know.
  • We'll tell you what we think, not what advertisers want you to hear.
  • We say it as we see it. Our expert reviewers love technology and want you to love it too. If it's garbage, we'll warn you.
  • If a product doesn't meet our high standards, we'll tell you why not. 
  • We'll test products in real life, with a minimum acceptable number of days of testing required before we write our reviews to ensure every product has been thoroughly dissected.
  • If you think we're not living up to our promise, please email the editor in chief and we'll endeavor to put it right.

If you want to know more about our testing philosophy, check out our overall “how we test” page on TechRadar.

How we test: professional and business monitors

TechRadar Pro is dedicated to providing accurate and unbiased reviews of professional and business monitors for our readers. Our team of experienced reviewers uses a thorough and objective approach when testing to ensure that our reviews are comprehensive and accurate.

When evaluating monitors, we consider key features such as display quality, connectivity, additional features and ergonomics. We source and test a range of monitors from various manufacturers and retailers, using various methods to assess their performance. This includes setting up the monitors in our office and using them for everyday tasks, as well as evaluating display quality, connectivity, and functionality for professional and business-specific tasks.

Once we have completed our testing, we compile our notes and observations into comprehensive reviews. This review includes a detailed breakdown of the monitor's key features and our overall assessment of its performance, as well as a pros and cons list to help readers easily understand the strengths and weaknesses of the monitor.

Our goal is to provide our readers with the information they need to decide which professional or business monitor is right for them. We strive to be thorough, objective, and fair in our reviews, and we hope our efforts help our readers find the perfect monitor for their needs.

Why should you trust us?

At TechRadar Pro, we are committed to providing our readers with accurate and unbiased reviews of the products we test. Our team of reviewers has extensive experience in evaluating a wide range of products, and we take pride in our thorough and objective approach to testing.

When it comes to professional and business monitors, we understand that these products can be a significant investment for many people. That's why we go to great lengths to ensure that our reviews are as comprehensive and accurate as possible. We source and test various monitors from manufacturers and retailers and use several methods to evaluate their key features and performance.

We strive to provide our readers with the information they need to make informed decisions about these important purchases. We hope that our readers find the perfect monitor for their needs.

What we look for

Display quality

One of the most important factors to consider when choosing a professional or business monitor is the quality of the display. This includes factors such as resolution, color accuracy, contrast ratio, and overall image clarity. We test each monitor's display to ensure that it meets our high standards for professional use.


Another important consideration when choosing a professional or business monitor is its connectivity options. We evaluate each monitor's available inputs and outputs, including HDMI, DisplayPort, USB-C, and more, to ensure that it can easily connect to a variety of devices. We also consider the monitor's ability to support multiple displays, as many professionals use multiple monitors for increased productivity.

Additional features

As well as display quality and connectivity, we also consider any additional features that a professional or business monitor may offer. This could include extras like built-in speakers, integrated webcams, or advanced display settings. We evaluate these features to determine their usefulness and effectiveness in a professional setting.


Given that many professionals will be using their monitors for extended periods of time, we also consider the ergonomics of each model. This includes the monitor's adjustability in terms of height, tilt, and swivel, as well as its overall comfort and ease of use.

Tue, 10 Jan 2023 03:47:00 -0600 en-US text/html
Killexams : Louth SF TD states Government and RSA need to get their acts together on NCT tests

Sinn Féin TD for Louth and East Meath Imelda Munster has called on the Tánaiste to address the ongoing backlog for NCT tests in the Drogheda area.

peaking in the Dáil Deputy Munster said “This government says that the average waiting time for an NCT test should be 12 Days.

“In reality, 60% of NCT centres have no test appointment available within the next five months.”

“As of last week, nine testing sites had no appointment available until August, and Drogheda is one of them.

“I raised the waiting time for an NCT test in the Drogheda testing centre last year when the wait time for an NCT test was 6 months and now that has stretched out even further to 7 months”

“It’s worse it’s getting instead of improving,” she said.

“Because of the long wait times peoples’ certificates of road worthiness are going out of date. A constituent called me recently who booked her NCT in Drogheda on October 30th last year and her test is set for 29 May 2023.”

“She is worried because her insurance company told her that she is not fully covered for every scenario without her NCT.

“She and everyone else who is left without a certificate of road worthiness because of these long waiting times are at risk of getting a €60 fine and 3 penalty points on their licence.

“And to add insult to injury the RSA admitted that no customers have been given a free test despite a promise in the NCT Customer Charter.

“I’ve stated it loud and clear, on the record, that all NCT Centres but especially Drogheda and the others that have a 7-month waiting time need to be given the resources to clear the backlog”

Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:08:00 -0600 en text/html
Killexams : Sports briefs: RSA, Zoeller pull off upsets in Rochester Men's Hockey League cannot provide a good user experience to your browser. To use this site and continue to benefit from our journalism and site features, please upgrade to the latest version of Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari.

Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:10:00 -0600 en-US text/html

Online Test Engine (OTE)

Online Test Engine uses the actual questions and answers we take from actual exams. OTE is full screen test engine that provide you the experience of same test environment as you experience in test center.

050-SEPROSIEM-01 Exam Simulator (Desktop Software) Screens

Exam Simulator 3.0.9 uses the actual 050-SEPROSIEM-01 questions and answers that make up braindumps. 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Exam Simulator is full screen windows application that provide you the experience of same test environment as you experience in test center.

About Us

We are a group of Certified Professionals, working hard to provide up to date and 100% valid test questions and answers.

Who We Are

We are a group of Certified Professionals, working hard to provide up to date and 100% valid test questions and answers. Our team consists of Teachers, Technology Article writers, software developers and Certified Professionals. Our information sources is

What We Do

We provide actual questions and answers that we obtain from our authentic resources. This question bank contains up to date braindumps that help to pass exam at first attempt. We develop Exam Simulator for realistic exam experience. Exam simulator helps to memorize and practice questions and answers. We take premium exams from

Why Choose Us

Question bank that we provide is updated on regular basis. All the Questions and Answers are verified and corrected by certified professionals. Online test help is provided 24x7 by our certified professionals.


Happy clients




Exams Provided



Premium 050-SEPROSIEM-01 Full Version

Our premium 050-SEPROSIEM-01 - RSA Certified SE Professional in Security Information and Event Management contains complete question bank contains actual exam questions. Premium 050-SEPROSIEM-01 braindumps are updated on regular basis and verified by certified professionals. There is one time payment during 3 months, no auto renewal and no hidden charges. During 3 months any change in the exam questions and answers will be available in your download section and you will be intimated by email to re-download the exam file after update.

Contact Us

We provide Live Chat and Email Support 24x7. Our certification team is available only on email. Order and Troubleshooting support is available 24x7.

4127 California St,
San Francisco, CA 22401

+1 218 180 22490